Skip to main content

Table 5 Evaluation of the structural model

From: Enhancing employee wellbeing and happiness management in the wine industry: unveiling the role of green human resource management

Direct Effects

Path Coefficient

t-Value

P Values

95% BCCI

Hypothesis supported

GHRM â—Š SP

0.386

4.505

0.000*

[0.245; 0.486]

H1 supported

GHRM â—Š EW

0.435

5.014

0.000*

[0.361; 0.567]

H2 supported

EW â—Š SP

0.319

3.768

0.000*

[0.217; 0.447]

H3 supported

GHRM â—Š WE

0.247

2.984

0.000*

[0.138; 0.475]

H5 supported

WE â—Š SP

0.319

3.879

0.000*

[0.205; 0.426]

H6 supported

Indirect Effects

Path Coefficient

t-Value

P Values

95% BCCI

Hypothesis supported

GHRM â—Š EW â—Š SP

0.139

2.859

0.000*

[0.078; 0.236]

H4 supported

GHRM â—Š WE â—Š SP

0.079

2.108

0.025**

[0.025; 0.189]

H7 supported

  1. Notes: BCCI = Bias Corrected Confidence Intervals; *p < 0.001 **p < 0.05
  2. Source: compiled by authors