Towards a multidimensional measure of well-being: cross-cultural support through the Italian validation of the well-being profile

Table 4 Associations between psychological correlates and short versions of the WB-Pro

	WB-Pro 15	WB-Pro 5	G-factor	WB-Pro15 Factors
S_Autonomy	0.77	0.77	0.71	Autonomy	0.60
F_Autonomy	− 0.43	− 0.43	− 0.39	Autonomy	− 0.41
S_Relatedness	0.58	0.65	0.60	Positive relations	0.78
F_Relatedness	− 0.40	− 0.44	− 0.39	Positive relations	− 0.56
S_Competence	0.80	0.83	0.71	Competence	0.44
F_Competence	− 0.58	− 0.59	− 0.52	Competence	− 0.32
BFC_consciousness	0.67	0.73	0.64	Competence	0.47
BFE_extraversion	0.68	0.79	0.62	Engagement	0.50
BFN_neuroticism	− 0.68	− 0.66	− 0.57	Emotional stability	− 0.86
BFA_agreeableness	0.42	0.55	0.48	Prosocial behavior	0.70
BFO_openness	0.48	0.57	0.48	Engagement	0.41
Flourishing	0.94	0.96	0.89
WEMWBS	0.85	0.88	0.78

Note. The versions WB-Pro 15 and WB-Pro 5 are based on the items identified by Marsh and colleagues [1]. The WB-Pro 15 factors are the same specific scales from the 48-item version of the WB-Pro used by Marsh et al. [1] for the validation of their two formative short forms. The G-factor has been extracted from the bifactor- ESEM that we computed on the 48-item Italian version of the WB-Pro.

ISSN: 2050-7283