Skip to main content

Table 6 Binary logistic regression model: Which patients utilize psycho-oncological interventions?

From: Psychosocial impact of prognostic genetic testing in uveal melanoma patients: a controlled prospective clinical observational study

Parameters

B (SE)

Wald

OR

95% CI

p

Age

−.043 (.025)

2.869

.958

.985–1.007

.090

Sex

 male

Ref.

    

 female

−1.399 (.535)

6.838

.247

.087–.704

.009*

Graduation

 Intermediate school or less (< 12 years)

Ref.

    

 High School or higher

.592 (.553)

1.145

1.807

.611–5.342

.285

Resilience

−.059 (.034)

3.008

.943

.882–1.008

.083

Social Support

.252 (.515)

.239

1.287

.469–3.532

.625

Fear of progression (Total)

.536 (.489)

1.202

1.709

.656–4.455

.273

General Distress

.402 (.151)

7.108

1.494

1.112–2.007

.008*

Depression

.028 (.100)

.081

1.029

.846–1.250

.776

Anxiety

−.383 (.125)

9.346

.682

.533–.872

.002**

Quality of Life: Physical

.019 (.029)

.421

1.019

.963–1.078

.516

Quality of Life: Mental

−.003 (.029)

.013

.997

.941–1.055

.908

Perceived Risk

.149 (.124)

1.440

1.160

.910–1.479

.230

Enucleation

.414 (.634)

.427

1.513

.437–5.243

.513

 No

Ref.

    

 Yes

.414 (.634)

.427

1.513

.437–5.243

.513

Group

.269 (.318)

.318

1.308

.701–2.440

.398

 OG

Ref.

.717

  

.699

 D3

.245 (.671)

.134

1.278

.343–4.764

.715

 M3

.543 (.650)

.697

1.721

.481–6.152

.404

  1. Note: R2 = .227 (Cox&Snell), .365 (Nagelkerke). Model χ2(14) = 41.97, * p < .05, **p < .005. OG Observational Group, D3 Disomy 3, M3 Monosomy 3