Skip to main content

Table 3 Post-hoc comparisons - effects on precision in participant 1

From: Getting nowhere fast: trade-off between speed and precision in training to execute image-guided hand-tool movements

 

D Means

t

P

Session 1

 2D vs. Direct

610.9

8.91

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

161.5

2.38

0.020

 Fisheye vs. Direct

461.5

5.91

0.000

Session 2

 2D vs. Direct

300.3

4.34

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

147.1

2.13

0.027

 Fisheye vs. Direct

153.2

2.21

0.033

Session 3

 2D vs. Direct

468.8

6.77

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

173.9

2.51

0.012

 Fisheye vs. Direct

294.8

4.26

0.000

Session 4

 2D vs. Direct

8.8

0.17

0.126 NS

 2D vs. Fisheye

11.9

0.24

0.102 NS

 Fisheye vs. Direct

30.2

0.92

0.095 NS

Session 5

 2D vs. Direct

366.5

5.30

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

218.4

3.15

0.002

 Fisheye vs. Direct

140.4

2.04

0.032

Session 6

 2D vs. Direct

29.8

0.76

0.222 NS

 2D vs. Fisheye

56.4

0.43

0.201 NS

 Fisheye vs. Direct

83.4

0.84

0.098 NS

Session 7

 2D vs. Direct

50.3

1.25

0.133 NS

 2D vs. Fisheye

41.2

0.19

0.224 NS

 Fisheye vs. Direct

240.0

3.81

0.002

Session 8

 2D vs. Direct

80.5

1.06

0.089 NS

 2D vs. Fisheye

56.5

0.31

0.156 NS

 Fisheye vs. Direct

66.0

0.13

0.222 NS

  1. Results of the post-hoc comparisons for effects on precision of the three levels of ‘viewing’ (V 3 ) in the eight levels of ‘session’ (S 8 ) in level 1 of the ‘participant’ factor. Effect sizes (D Means), t values, and unadjusted probabilities (P) are given for each comparison
Back to article page

BMC Psychology

ISSN: 2050-7283

Contact us