Skip to main content

Table 4 Cross-lagged and autoregressive unstandardised estimates of aggressive and prosocial behaviour, and treatment effects

From: The developmental relation between aggressive behaviour and prosocial behaviour: A 5-year longitudinal study

 

Teacher

Parent

Child

 

B

B

B

Cross-lagged

   

Aggressive (7) → Prosocial (8)

-.053*

-.149***

-.079***

Aggrresive (8) → Prosocial (9)

-.102***

-.089***

-.034Â¥

Aggressive (9) → Prosocial (11)

-.092**

-.073*

-.014

Prosocial (7) → Aggressive (8)

-.025

-.028

-.018

Prosocial (8) → Aggressive (9)

-.033

-.025

.012

Prosocial (9) → Aggressive (11)

-.015

-.030

.039

Autoregressive

   

Aggressive (7) → Aggressive (8)

.633***

.713***

.371***

Aggressive (8) → Aggressive (9)

.624***

.686***

.469***

Aggressive (9) → Aggressive (11)

.377***

.557***

.453***

Prososcial (7) → Prosocial (8)

.598***

.575***

.269***

Prosocial (8) → Prosocial (9)

.617***

.641***

.371***

Prosocial (9) → Prosocial (11)

.265***

.618***

.291***

Triple P

   

Aggressive (8)

.060*

.001

-.014Â¥

Aggressive (9)

.001

-.001

-.006

Aggressive (11)

-.038

.008

-.014

Prosocial (8)

.063Â¥

-.006

.002

Prosocial (9)

-.159***

-.001

-.008

Prosocial (11)

-.022

.026

.002

Paths

   

Aggressive (9)

.029

-.010

.006

Aggressive (11)

-.027

-.013

-.009

Prosocial (9)

-.019

-.031

-.015*

Prosocial (11)

-.053

.048Â¥

.003

  1. Note: The numbers in brackets indicate age at time of measurement. The presented coefficients are ustandardised estimates recommended by Kline (1998) to be used when reporting results in AMOS, as only those (and not the standardised estimates) are affected by identification constraints (Arbuckle, 1995).
  2. ***p < .001, **p < .01; *p < .05; ¥ < .10.
Back to article page

BMC Psychology

ISSN: 2050-7283

Contact us