Skip to main content

School climate and academic burnout in medical students: a moderated mediation model of collective self-esteem and psychological capital

Abstract

Background

The study burnout of medical students is more and more serious, which directly affects the study style of university and the learning quality of students. This has aroused the high attention of researchers and universities. This study aimed to explore the mechanism of the influence of school climate on academic burnout among medical students in Chinese cultural context.

Methods

2411 medical students (50.52% female; mean age = 19.55, SD = 1.41, rang = 17–24 years) were investigated with psychological environment questionnaire, collective self-esteem scale, psychological capital scale and academic burnout scale. The data were analyzed by using a moderated mediation model with SPSS and the Process 4.0 macro.

Results

The results revealed that: (1) school climate had a significant negative predictive effect on academic burnout among medical students controlling for gender, grade and age (B = -0.40, p < 0.001). (2) Collective self-esteem played a partial mediating role in school climate and academic burnout (indirect effect = -0.28, 95% CI = [-0.32,-0.25], accounting for 52.83%). (3) The first and second half of the indirect effect of school climate on medical students’ academic burnout were moderated by psychological capital (B = 0.03, p < 0.01; B = -0.09, p < 0.001).High level of psychological capital can enhance the link between school climate and collective self-esteem as well as the link between self-esteem and academic burnout.

Conclusion

Creating a good school atmosphere and improving the level of collective self-esteem and psychological capital are beneficial to improve the academic burnout of medical students.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Academic burnout is a negative attitude and behaviour of students who are bored with learning due to pressure or lack of interest in learning [1]. Its negative effects are mainly reflected in physical and mental health (e.g. insomnia, weakness), emotional adaptation (e.g. anxiety, depression) and behaviour (e.g. aggression, dropping out of school) [2,3,4]. Medical students are more prone to academic burnout due to their long training cycles, course content and heavy study load as a reservoir of healthcare professionals [5]. A meta-analysis study showed that the detection rate of academic burnout among medical students was about 44.2% [6]. Therefore, it is important to explore the factors influencing academic burnout among medical students and its mechanisms of action to promote the quality of learning and positive development of medical students.

School climate and academic burnout

Schools are important micro-systems that influence the growth and development of individuals in addition to the family [7]. They are not only places where individuals learn and develop cognitively, but are also important contextual factors for the formation of positive social relationships and for their emotional and behavioral development [8]. As a result, a growing body of research has focused on the impact of school climate on the physical and psychological development of individuals [9,10,11]. School climate, also known as the school psychological environment, refers to the relatively persistent and stable features of the environment that students experience and influence their behaviour [12], including the norms, goals, values, interpersonal relationships, teaching practices and organizational structures of the school environment [13]. Numerous studies have shown that school climate is strongly associated with healthy adolescent development, with the more positive the perceived school climate, the less suicidal ideation, depression, bullying, etc. [14, 15]. According to the Stage-Environment Matching Theory, when the school climate meets the developmental needs of students, it strengthens the connection between individuals and the school which could promote good development; on the contrary, when the school climate does not meet the developmental needs of students, they are prone to psychological and behavioral problems [16, 17]. A positive school climate in terms of teacher-student relationships, peer relationships and student autonomy can lead to a strong attachment to the school in which students are studying, which is an important protective factor against problematic behaviour [18] and can push motivation to learn and less likely to develop academic burnout [19]. Empirical studies have also found that school climate is significantly and negatively associated with academic burnout in primary school students [20]. Previous study on the relationship between school climate and academic burnout has focused on primary and secondary school students, and less on medical students. However, there is an inherent consistency between university campuses and primary and secondary school campuses, mainly in terms of school norms and discipline, teacher-student relationships, peer relationships, and physical environment, which are all important components of school climate [21]. Accordingly, this study proposes hypothesis 1: School climate negatively predicts academic burnout among medical students.

Although the relationship between school climate and academic burnout has been partially verified by researchers, the exact mechanisms of the relationship are still largely unclear. Therefore, the question of how school climate “influences” medical student burnout needs to be further explored.

The mediating role of collective self-esteem

The ego self-system process model suggests that external environmental resources influence developmental outcomes through an individual’s internal self-system [22]. Therefore, the influence of school climate on medical student burnout may be mediated by collective self-esteem. Self-esteem, as an important component of the ego system, includes both individual and collective self-esteem [23] and is an important protective resource for mental health [24]. The former is the overall positive evaluation and acceptance of individuals to themselves [25, 26], while the latter is the individual’s evaluation and perception of the value of the group he or she belongs to, which emphasizes a sense of collective value, respect and belonging [27]. In the context of Chinese collectivist culture, self-esteem, with its strong collective and social overtones, has also become a focus of research [28, 29]. Existing studies also indirectly support the mediating path of school climate - collective self-esteem - academic burnout. On the one hand, collective self-esteem helps to reduce academic burnout. Self-categorization theory suggests that the pursuit of self-improvement and self-esteem is one of the most basic motivations of people [30]. Since in-group evaluations are essentially evaluations of the self, when individuals identify with the group to which they belong, they would strive to enhance or protect the prestige and status of their group in relation to other groups, producing more adaptive outcomes [31]. Empirical studies have also shown that collective self-esteem significantly and negatively predicts academic burnout, individuals with low collective self-esteem tend to lack good motivation to learn and thus exhibiting more academic burnout [32, 33]. On the other hand, collective self-esteem is influenced by school climate. According to sociometric theory, a positive school climate, typically reflecting a supportive environment [34], enhances psychological and socio-emotional functioning and raises one’s self-esteem [35,36,37]. Empirical studies have also shown that school climate can be a significant positive predictor of collective self-esteem [38,39,40]. When students perceive that they are accepted and supported by important people (e.g. teachers, classmates), they also have a stronger sense of belonging and identification with school and show higher levels of collective self-esteem [41, 42]; conversely, a negative school climate decreases students’ overall evaluation of school and shows lower levels of collective self-esteem [43]. Accordingly, this study proposes hypothesis 2: collective self-esteem may mediate the relationship between school climate and academic burnout.

The moderating role of Psychological capital

Although collective self-esteem may mediate the relationship between school climate and academic burnout, there may still be moderating variables, i.e. the process by which school climate influences academic burnout may be moderated by other factors. With the rise of positive psychology, the additive role of psychological capital on individual psychology and behaviour has received increasing attention from researchers [44,45,46]. According to mental resilience research, exposure to situational risk does not imply poor development of mental health, and certain positive qualities (e.g. psychological capital) help individuals overcome the adverse effects of severe adversity [47, 48]. Thus, psychological capital may play a moderating role in the process of school climate affecting academic burnout. Psychological capital refers to a positive psychological state that individuals demonstrate as they grow and develop, and includes four core elements: resilience (the ability to recover and grow positively from adversity and setbacks), optimism (positive beliefs about the present and future), hope (a positive state of motivation to strive to achieve goals in multiple ways) and self-efficacy (the belief in one’s ability to succeed when faced with challenging tasks) [49], which is an important protective factor for individual psychological well-being and facilitates resistance to the adverse effects of external stressors such as academic burnout [50, 51]. Previous research has shown that psychological capital is negatively associated with academic burnout in nursing students, increasing engagement in learning and reducing academic burnout [52]. All elements of psychological capital also positively predict collective self-esteem, high psychological capital has positive and effective coping strategies, which exhibiting higher levels of collective self-esteem [53]. Self-depletion theory suggests that human psychological resources are limited, and although individuals can mobilize internal resources to cope with various external risks, they are not replenished in time and are prone to negative consequences [54]. As a positive psychological quality, individuals with high psychological capital can cope with the negative effects of a negative school climate [55], and enhance the positive effects of a positive school climate on cognition, mood and behavior [56]. The individual-environment interaction model states that individual development is the result of the interaction between individual factors and the environment in which the individual lives [57]. This means that academic burnout and collective self-esteem are not only closely related to environmental factors (school climate), but may also be influenced by individual factors (psychological capital). This suggests that psychological capital may regulate the relationship between school climate and collective self-esteem or academic burnout.

Secondly, psychological capital and collective self-esteem, as protective factors, may work together to reduce academic burnout. Psychological capital has been found to enhance the positive impact of protective factors on individual school adjustment [56]. According to the protective factor-protective factor model, different protective factors may interact with each other to influence developmental outcomes [58]. Researchers have summarized two different hypotheses: the facilitation hypothesis and the exclusion hypothesis [59, 60]. According to the facilitation hypothesis, the effect of school climate on collective self-esteem or academic burnout and collective self-esteem on academic burnout is stronger as the level of psychological capital increases [61]. According to the exclusion hypothesis, as the level of psychological capital increases, the effect of school climate on collective self-esteem or academic burnout and collective self-esteem on academic burnout decreases [62]. At present, there has been on research point out the moderating mode of psychological capital in the relationship between school climate and academic burnout (direct and indirect pathways). Accordingly, this study only hypothesized that psychological capital may play a moderating role in the influence of school climate on academic burnout through collective self-esteem (Hypothesis 3), without making specific hypotheses about the specific moderating patterns.

In summary, this study constructs a moderated mediation model based on the Stage-Environment Matching Theory and the Protective Factor-Protective Factor Model (see Fig. 1 for the hypothetical model) to examine the mediating role of collective self-esteem in the relationship between school climate and medical students’ academic burnout, and the role of psychological capital in this mediating role. The model is designed to test the role of collective self-esteem in mediating the relationship between school climate and medical student burnout, and the moderating role of psychological capital in this mediating process, in order to provide guidance for the prevention and reduction of medical student burnout.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Hypothetical model

Methods

Participants

A cluster random sampling method was used to select 2,600 medical students from seven medical colleges and universities in Anhui Province as the research objects. 189 invalid questionnaires with missing values and test results outside ± 3 standard deviations were excluded [63]. Finally, 2411 valid questionnaires were obtained, and the effective recovery rate was 92.73%. Among them, there were 1193 boys (49.48%), 1218 girls (50.52%); 641 freshmen (26.59%), 673 sophomores (27.91%), 585 juniors (24.26%), and 512 seniors (21.24%). The subjects were between 17 and 24 years old, with an average age of 19.55 years (SD = 1.41 years).

Measures

School climate

The “School Psychological Environment Questionnaire” (SPEQ) developed by Xu and Zhong [64] was used to measure the subjects’ perceived school climate, and has been validated to have good reliability and validity [65]. The questionnaire has a total of 30 items, including 7 reverse questions, which is composed of six dimensions: teacher-student relationship (e.g., “teacher cares about me.”), classmate relationship (e.g.,“classmates care about each other.”), collective activities (e.g., “I participate in group activities.”), professional development (e.g. “I learned about possible careers in the future.”), resources (e.g., “The resources in the school do not meet my needs.”), and institutions and order (e.g., “The rules and regulations of the department are helpful for the development of students.”). A 5-point Likert scale was used, with 1–5 points for “Never” to “always” respectively. After reverse scoring, the average score for all items was calculated, with higher scores indicating more positive school climate perceived. In this study, the Cronbach’s α coefficient of this questionnaire was 0.93.

Collective self-esteem

The collective self-esteem level of the subjects was measured using the “collective self-esteem scale” (CSES) developed by Luhtanen and Crocker [66], and has been validated to have good reliability and validity [67]. The scale has 16 items, including 8 reverse questions, which is composed of four dimensions: membership self-esteem (e.g.,“I am a valuable member of the class collective.“), private collective self-esteem (e.g., “I feel good about the school where I belong.”), public collective self-esteem (e.g., “generally, others respect our school.”), identity importance (e.g., “generally, the identity of school group members is an important part of my self-image.”). A 7-point Likert scale was used, with 1–7 points for “very inconsistent” to “very consistent” respectively. After the reverse scoring, the average score was calculated for all items, with higher scores indicating higher levels of collective self-esteem. In this study, the Cronbach’s α coefficient of this scale was 0.87.

Psychological capital

The “Positive Psychological Capital Questionnaire” (PPQ) developed by Zhang et al. [68] was used to measure the psychological capital level of the subjects, and has been validated to have good reliability and validity [69]. The questionnaire consists of 26 items, consisting of four dimensions of optimism (e.g., “I always see the bright side of things.“), hope (e.g., “I pursue my goals with confidence.“), self-efficacy (e.g., “I can always do well Completion of tasks.”) and resilience (e.g., “When I encounter setbacks, I can quickly recover.”).A 7-point scale was used, with 1–7 points for “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree” respectively. Calculate the average score of all items and higher scores indicate higher levels of psychological capital. In this study, the Cronbach’s α coefficient of this questionnaire was 0.94.

Academic burnout

The academic burnout scale (LBS) developed by Lian et al. [1], and has been validated to have good reliability and validity [70]. The scale has 20 items in total, including 8 reverse questions, which are composed of three dimensions: low mood(e.g., “I am tired of studying.“), low sense of accomplishment(e.g.,“I am energetic when studying.“) and improper behavior(e.g., “only I only read it when I take the test.”). A 7-point Likert scale is used, with 1–7 points for"very inconsistent” to “very consistent”. After reverse scoring, the average score for all items is calculated, with higher scores indicating higher levels of academic burnout. In this study, the Cronbach’s α coefficient of this scale was 0.89.

Procedures and statistical analysis

After obtaining the informed consent of the subjects, group testing was conducted in a class as a unit. The main test was held by a strictly trained graduate student majoring in psychology, who explained the instructions in detail to the subjects and emphasized that the content was strictly confidential and answered anonymously according to their actual situation. The test time took 12 min in total and all the questionnaires were collected on the spot.SPSS 25.0 and PCOCESS3.3 developed by Hayes were used for data processing and analysis [71].

Results

Common method bias and multicollinearity test

Restricted by objective conditions, this study only used the method of self-report by the subjects to collect data, and the results may be affected by common method bias. According to the suggestions of Podsakoff et al. [72], control is carried out in terms of procedures, such as using an anonymous method for testing and using reverse questions for some items. After data collection was completed, HarmanOne-factor test was used to test for common method bias. The results showed that a total of 13 factors with eigenvalues greater than 1were extracted,and the unrotated variation of the first factor was 28.91%, which was lower than the critical standard of 40%. At the same time, the variance inflation factor values of all predictors are between 2.02 and 2.09 (less than 5 means there is no collinearity), and the tolerance is between 0.45 and 0.50 (more than 0.1 means there is no collinearity) [73]. Therefore, the influence of common method bias and multicollinearity on the results of this study is basically excluded.

Descriptive statistics and correlation analysis

Table 1 lists the mean, standard deviation and correlation matrix for each variable. The results showed that academic burnout was significantly negatively correlated with school psychological environment (r = -0.54, p < 0.001), collective self-esteem (r = -0.60, p < 0.001) and psychological capital (r = -0.69, p < 0.001); School psychological environment was significantly positively correlated with collective self-esteem (r = 0.68, p < 0.001) and psychological capital (r = 0.63, p < 0.001); collective self-esteem was significantly positively correlated with psychological capital (r = 0.67, p < 0.001). Considering that gender, grade, and age were significantly correlated with the main research variables, the three were included as control variables in the subsequent analysis to improve the accuracy of the model.

Table 1 Mean, standard deviation and correlation matrix of each variable

Moderated mediation test

First, using Model4 in the SPSS macro program PROCESS (Model4 is a simple mediation model) to test the mediating effect of collective self-esteem in the relationship between school psychological environment and academic burnout under the control of gender, grade and age. The results are shown in Table 2, the school psychological environment significantly negatively predicted academic burnout (B = − 0.40, p < 0.001), and significantly positively predicted collective self-esteem (B = 0.65, p < 0.001); When predicting academic burnout at the same time, school psychological environment can still significantly negatively predict academic burnout (B = -0.25, p < 0.001), and collective self-esteem significantly negatively predicts academic burnout (B = -0.44, p < 0.001). Based on the bias-corrected percentile Bootstrap method, it was further found that collective self-esteem played a partial mediating role between the school psychological environment and academic burnout, and its 95% CI was [-0.32, -0.25]. The mediating effect (-0.28) accounted for 52.83% of the total effect (-0.53).

Table 2 Mediation model test of collective self-esteem

Secondly, Model59 in SPSS macro program PROCESS (adjusting the first half path,the second half path and the direct path, which is consistent with the hypothetical model)was used to test the moderating effect of psychological capital under the condition of controlling gender, grade and age. The results are shown in Table 3. After adding psychological capital, the interaction term between school psychological environment and psychological capital significantly positively predicted collective self-esteem (B = 0.03, p < 0.01), indicating that psychological capital modulates the relationship between school psychological environment and collective self-esteem; The interaction item of collective self-esteem and psychological capital significantly negatively predicted academic burnout (B = -0.09, p < 0.001), indicating that psychological capital moderates the relationship between collective self-esteem and academic burnout; while the interaction term between school psychological environment and psychological capital had no significant predictive effect on academic burnout (B = -0.02, p > 0.05), indicating that psychological capital could not moderate the relationship between school psychological environment and academic burnout. In conclusion, school psychological environment, collective self-esteem, psychological capital, and academic burnout constitute a moderated mediating model. Specifically, school psychological environment influences the first half path of academic burnout through collective self-esteem, and the second half path is regulated by psychological capital.

Table 3 Moderated mediation model test of school climate on academic burnout

In order to better explain the moderated mediation model, psychological capital is divided into high group and low group according to the mean plus or minus one standard deviation. simple slope analysis is performed and a simple effect analysis graph is drawn. As shown in Fig. 2, when the individual’s psychological capital level is low, the school psychological environment significantly positively predicts collective self-esteem (Bsimple = 0.37, t = 16.91, p < 0.001); when the individual’s psychological capital level is high, the school Mental environment still significantly positively predicted collective self-esteem and increased predictive power (Bsimple = 0.43, t = 22.44, p < 0.001). The results show that with the increase of psychological capital level, the predictive effect of school psychological environment on collective self-esteem is enhanced. It can be seen from Fig. 3 that when the individual’s psychological capital level is low, collective self-esteem significantly negatively predicts academic burnout (Bsimple = -0.10, t = -3.29, p < 0.01); when the individual’s psychological capital level is high, school Mental environment still significantly negatively predicted collective self-esteem and increased predictive power (Bsimple = -0.29, t = -10.77, p < 0.001). The results show that with the increase of psychological capital level, the predictive effect of collective self-esteem on academic burnout is enhanced.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The interaction between school climate and psychological capital on collective self-esteem

Fig. 3
figure 3

The interaction between collective self-esteem and psychological capital on academic burnout

Discussion

This study found that school climate significantly and negatively predicted medical students’ academic burnout, confirming research hypothesis 1. This suggests that a positive school climate is an important protective factor for medical students’ academic burnout, reducing the likelihood of academic burnout and providing good environmental conditions for medical students’ learning, which is consistent with previous research [18, 20]. The results also support the stage-environment match theory, which states that matching the school environment with student needs promotes more positive outcomes [16]. Self-determination theory suggests that autonomy, relationship and competence needs are basic psychological needs of individuals and are motivational in nature [74]. Medical students are largely mature in their physical and mental development and desire to have their basic needs met. Good teacher-student relationships, peer relationships, fair rules and order on campus can meet these needs, making students more inclined to align with the school’s goals and values, motivating intrinsic learning and actively seek academic progress [75]; Conversely, when school fail to meet this psychological need, students may turn to other environments for satisfaction, such as online games [76], which in the long run may lead to problems such as lack of interest in learning and reduced motivation to learn, which may lead to truancy or a sense of alienation from learning in turn.

Moreover, this study also found that school climate can indirectly influence medical students’ academic burnout through collective self-esteem, confirming hypothesis 2. This result also confirms the self-system process model [22], which suggests that collective self-esteem plays a key role in individual adaptation to the external environment and is a proximal factor in school climate influencing academic burnout. Firstly, positive campus characteristics such as good teacher-student relationships, sound infrastructures and fair systems promote a higher sense of belonging to the school, making students feel part of the school, more aware of their importance and value in their group, hold more positive evaluations of the school and show higher levels of collective self-esteem [65]. Secondly, anxiety is an important emotional manifestation of academic burnout, and self-esteem is an important force in reducing anxiety [26, 77]. Individuals with high collective self-esteem are more likely to have a positive emotional experience of school, maintain a good emotional state even when suffering from chronic academic stress, seek social support to alleviate anxiety, and engage in learning with a positive attitude, thereby reducing academic burnout [78]. The rationale for collective self-esteem as a mediating variable is also supported by the perspective of social control theory. The theory emphasizes that the emotional connection between the individual and the school is a protective factor for individual development, and that this connection causes the individual to strive to align with social expectations, thereby avoiding negative consequences [10]. A positive school climate can lead to students developing a positive emotional connection with school, enabling them to control their own behaviour, move towards the academic goals expected by the school, and become actively engaged in learning activities, thereby reducing academic burnout [79]; conversely, when students lack this emotional connection with school, they can become negative about school activities, even if they believe that academics are important to them. In contrast, when students lack this emotional connection to school, they may become resistant to school activities, even if they consider it important, and gradually lose interest and enthusiasm for learning, which can be detrimental to academic achievement [80].

Additionally, this study also found that psychological capital moderates the mediating process of “school climate → collective self-esteem → academic burnout”, in that the first and second halves of the mediating chain are moderated by psychological capital, which partially confirms research hypothesis 3. On the one hand, psychological capital moderates the relationship between school climate and medical students’ collective self-esteem. School climate moderates the relationship between school climate and the collective self-esteem of medical students, which is more influential on the collective self-esteem of medical students with high psychological capital than those with low psychological capital. This moderating model is consistent with the facilitation, rather than exclusion, hypothesis of the “protective factor-protective factor” model, which suggests that psychological capital, as a positive psychological quality, can mobilize its own resources to enhance self-perceptions in a positive school environment [81], and supports the individual-environment interaction model [57]. Resource conservation theory suggests that students become relatively vulnerable when they are under-resourced and are likely to experience greater psychological stress and negative emotions; when they are well resourced they have better coping skills and a greater sense of self-worth and competence [82, 83]. Medical students with high psychological capital possess positive psychological qualities such as self-efficacy, hope, resilience and optimism, and are more sensitive to the positive components of the school climate, and are able to adopt cognitive strategies to adjust their mindset without wavering in their positive perceptions and evaluations of school, even when experiencing stressful events in school life [84].

On the other hand, psychological capital moderates the relationship between collective self-esteem and academic burnout among medical students. Collective self-esteem had a greater impact on academic burnout among medical students with high psychological capital than low psychological capital. This moderating pattern is also consistent with the facilitation hypothesis of the “protective factor-protective factor” model. High psychological capital is closely related to positive emotions [85]. According to the extended construct of positive emotion, individuals with high psychological capital have more flexible cognitive and behavioral patterns and are more likely to receive energy from external sources in response to external risks, whereas individuals with low psychological capital are more vulnerable to external risks and have more difficulty replenishing their energy after attrition [86]. It is evident that high psychological capital medical students, even if they lack an emotional connection to school, compensate for or counteract this negative impact through the various internal and external resources they have, better allocating their attention to their studies and exhibiting lower levels of academic burnout. It is worth noting that psychological capital did not moderate the effect of school climate on academic burnout in medical students, which is inconsistent with previous hypotheses. Further evidence suggests that a good school climate is an important protective factor for individuals’ positive psychological, behavioral development and that their academic burnout is protected by the protective effect of a good school climate regardless of their level of psychological capital [54]. Therefore, to promote good academic adjustment in medical students, it is important to focus not only on the role of internal factors (core self-assessment) but also on the role of external environmental factors (school climate).

Limitations and future directions

This study reveals the internal mechanism of school climate affecting medical students’ academic burnout, and has a certain reference value for improving school climate and reducing academic burnout. On the one hand, the current study suggests that school managers and educators should pay attention to the role of school climate in academic development, and strive to create a good school climate, which can be considered from the aspects of teacher-student relationship, classmate relationship, system and order, etc. On the other hand, under the circumstance that the school climate cannot be improved in the short term, it can promote the positive academic development by cultivating and improving students’ collective self-esteem and psychological capital level.

Additionally, the current study also has certain limitations that need to be improved in future studies. First, this study uses a cross-sectional study, which is difficult to reveal the causal relationship between variables. Future studies can use follow-up studies to further verify. Secondly, the data of the study comes from students’ self-reports, which may be affected by the social approval effect. Future research may consider adding more objective measurement methods such as experimental methods. Finally, whether the research results can be generalized to other groups needs to be further tested. The research may consider adding more groups (such as primary and secondary school students) to be tested.

Conclusion

This study constructs a moderated mediation model to explore the process by which school climate acts on academic burnout in medical students. It enriches the theoretical framework of stage-environment fit and provides practical implications for the development of positive psychological resources. Positive school climate can mitigate medical students’ academic burnout levels through collective self-esteem levels, and the relationship between school climate and collective self-esteem and between collective self-esteem and academic burnout is moderated by psychological capital. Therefore, creating a good school climate and improving the level of collective self-esteem and psychological capital is conducive to improving the academic burnout of medical students.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Lian R, Yang LX, Wu LH. Relationship between professional commitment and learning burnout of undergraduates and scales developing. Acta Psychol Sin. 2005;37(5):632–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arbabisarjou A, Hashemi SM, Sharif MR, Haji Alizadeh K, Yarmohammadzadeh P, Feyzollahi Z. The relationship between sleep quality and social intimacy, and academic burn-out in students of medical sciences. Glob J Health Sci. 2015;8(5):231–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Oloidi FJ, Sewagegn AA, Amanambu OV, Umeano BC, Ilechukwu LC. Academic burnout among undergraduate history students: Effect of an intervention. Med. 2022;101(7):e28886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li CQ, Ma Q, Liu YY, Jing KJ. Are parental rearing patterns and learning burnout correlated with empathy amongst undergraduate nursing students? Int J Nurs Sci. 2018;5(4):409–13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Thun-Hohenstein L, Höbinger-Ablasser C, Geyerhofer S, Lampert K, Schreuer M, Fritz C. Burnout in medical students. Neuropsychiatr. 2021;35(1):17–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Frajerman A, Morvan Y, Krebs M, Gorwood P, Chaumette B. Burnout in medical students before residency: a systematic review and meta–analysis. Eur Psychiat. 2019;55(1):36–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eccles JS, Roeser RW. Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. J Res Adol. 2011;21(1):225–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kalkan F, Dagli E. The relationships between school climate, school belonging and school burnout in secondary school students. Int J Contemp Educ Res. 2021;8(4):59–79.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aldridge JM, McChesney K. The relationships between school climate and adolescent mental health and well-being: a systematic literature review. Int J Educ Res. 2018;88:121–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang MT, Degol JL. School climate: a review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educ PsychoL Rev. 2016;28(2):315–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bradshaw CP, Waasdorp TE, Debnam KJ, Johnson SL. Measuring school climate in high schools: a focus on safety, engagement, and the environment. J Sch Health. 2014;84(9):593–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoy WK, Hannum JW. Middle school climate: an empirical assessment of organizational health and student achievement. Educ Admin Quart. 1977;33(3):290–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen J, Mccabe L, Michelli NM, Pickeral T. School climate: research, policy, practice, and teacher education. Teach Coll Rec. 2009;111(1):180–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. La Salle TP, Wang C, Parris L, Brown JA. Associations between school climate, suicidal thoughts, and behaviors and ethnicity among middle school students. Psychol Schools. 2017;54(10):1294–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Moore H, Benbenishty R, Astor RA, Rice E. The positive role of school climate on school victimization, depression, and suicidal ideation among school-attending homeless youth. J Sch Violence. 2018;17(3):298–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gutman LM, Eccles JS. Stage–environment fit during adolescence: trajectories of family relations and adolescent outcomes. Dev Psychol. 2007;43(2):522–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tian L, Tian Q, Huebner ES. School-related social support and adolescents’ school-related subjective well-being: the mediating role of basic psychological needs satisfaction at school. Soc Indic Res. 2016;128:105–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Teuber Z, Nussbeck FW, Wild E. School burnout among chinese high school students: the role of teacher-student relationships and personal resources. Educ Psychol. 2021;41(8):985–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Miller-Lewis LR, Sawyer ACP, Searle AK, Mittinty MN, Sawyer MG, Lynch JW. Student-teacher relationship trajectories and mental health problems in young children. Bmc Psychol. 2014;2(1):1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang J, Gao BC. The effects of the school climate and parental autonomy support on pupils’ learning burnout: the mediating effect of basic psychological needs. Chin J Spec Educ. 2019;223(1):89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou CM, Tao S, Liu HY, Wang CC, Qi X, Dong Q. The role of collective perception of school psychological environment in grades 4˜6 students’ academic achievement. Acta Psychol Sin. 2016;48(2):185–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Connell JP, Wellborn JG. Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: a motivational analysis of self-system processes. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991;65(23):43–77.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Crocker J, Major B. Social stigma and self-esteem: the self-protective properties of stigma. Psychol Rev. 1989;96(4):608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sánchez-Rojas AA, García-Galicia A, Vázquez-Cruz E, Montiel-Jarquín ÁJ, Aréchiga-Santamaría A. Self-image, self-esteem and depression in children and adolescents with and without obesity. Gac Med Mex. 2022;158(3):118–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Crocker J, Wolfe CT. Contingencies of self-worth. Psychol Rev. 2001;108(3):593–623.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Du H, King RB, Chi P. Self-esteem and subjective well-being revisited: the roles of personal, relational, and collective self-esteem. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(8):e0183958.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Veelen RV, Otten S, Cadinu M, Hansen N. An integrative model of social identification: self–stereotyping and self–anchoring as two cognitive pathways. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2016;20(1):3–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, Tan Y, Xu L, Ho CS, Ho RC. Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (covid-19) epidemic among the general population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(5):1729.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu X, Chen Y, Chen B, Guan L, Zhao Y. The relationship between regional gray matter volume of social exclusion regions and personal self-esteem is moderated by collective self-esteem. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1989.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Tajfel H, Turner J. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. Soc Psychol Intergr Relat. 1979;33(1):94–109.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Aberson CL, Healy M, Romero V. Ingroup bias and self–esteem: a meta–analysis. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2000;4(2):157–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gan Y, Xi Z, Hu Y. A new component of core self-evaluation in predicting burnout: collective self-esteem. Acta Sci Natur Univ Pekinensis. 2007;43(5):709.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Peng L, Chen X, Lei P, Zou R. School belonging and adjustment in migrant children: mediating role of collective self-esteem. Chin J Clin Psychol. 2012;20(2):237–9.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang C, Boyanton D, Ross ASM, Liu JL, Sullivan K, Anh Do K. School climate, victimization, and mental health outcomes among elementary school students in China. School Psychol Int. 2018;39(6):587–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yang X, Wang Y, Li D, Zhao L, Bao Z, Zhou Z. School climate and adolescents’ suicidal ideation and suicide attempts: the mediating role of self-esteem. Psychol Dev Educ. 2013;29(5):541–51.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lester L, Cross D. The relationship between school climate and mental and emotional well-being over the transition from primary to secondary school. Psychol We. 2015;5:1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tang M, Yan Y, Wang J. Teacher-student relationship and internalizing problems in adolescents: Mediating of self-esteem. Chin J Clin Psychol. 2016;24(06):1101–4.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Coelho VA, Bear GG, Brás P. A multilevel analysis of the importance of school climate for the trajectories of students’ self-concept and self-esteem throughout the middle school transition. J Youth Adol. 2020;49(9):1793–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Veiskarami HA, Ghadampour E, Mottaghinia MR. Interactions among school climate, collective self-efficacy, and personal self-efficiency: evidence from education institutions. Intern J Econ Perspect. 2017;11(1):481–8.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zhao Z, Liu G, Nie Q, Teng Z, Zhang D. School climate and bullying victimization among adolescents: a moderated mediation model. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2021;131(12):1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Knifsend CA, Green LA, Clifford KL. Extracurricular participation, collective self-esteem, and academic outcomes among college students. Psi Chi J Psychol Res. 2020;25(4):318–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bi Y, Ma L, Yuan F, Zhang B. Self-esteem, perceived stress, and gender during adolescence: interactive links to different types of interpersonal relationships. J Psychol. 2016;150(1):36–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Tong L, Reynolds K, Lee E, Liu Y. School Relational climate, social identity, and student well–being: new evidence from China on student depression and stress levels. Sch Ment Health. 2018;11(10):509–21.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zhao J, Wei G, Chen KH, Yien JM. Psychological capital and university students’ entrepreneurial intention in china: mediation effect of entrepreneurial capitals. Front Psychol. 2020;10:2984.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Hazan Liran B, Miller P. The role of psychological capital in academic adjustment among university students. J Happiness Stud. 2019;20:51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Younas S, Tahir F, Sabih F, Hussain R, Hassan A, Sohail M, et al. Psychological capital and mental health: empirical exploration in perspective of gender. Int J Sci Res. 2020;76:150–75.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Xiong J, Hai M, Wang J, Li Y, Jiang G. Cumulative risk and mental health in chinese adolescents: the moderating role of psychological capital. Sch Psychol Int. 2020;41(5):409–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Masten AS, Barnes AJ. Resilience in children: developmental perspectives. Child. 2018;5(7):98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Luthans F, Avolio BJ, Avey JB, Norman SM. Positive psychological capital: measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Pers Psychol. 2007;60(3):541–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Liu Y, Aungsuroch Y, Gunawan J, Zeng D. Job stress, psychological capital, perceived social support, and occupational burnout among hospital nurses. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2021;53:511–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhang S, Fu YN, Liu Q, Turel O, He Q. Psychological capital mediates the influence of meaning in life on prosocial behavior of university students: a longitudinal study. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2022;140:106600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Wang J, Bu L, Li Y, Song J, Li N. The mediating effect of academic engagement between psychological capital and academic burnout among nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Today. 2021;102:104938.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Ou YZ, Fan XH. Family SES and psychological capital and self-esteem among left-behind children. Chin J Clin Psychol. 2018;26:1182–90.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Muraven M, Tice DM. Ego depletion: is the active self a limited resource? J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;74(5):1252–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Yang FL, Li X, Zhu HD. School climate and adolescent’ social adjustment: a moderated mediation model. Chin J Clin Psychol. 2019;27(2):396–400.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Molden DC, Hall A, Hui CM, Scholer AA. Understanding how identity and value motivate self–regulation is necessary but not sufficient: a motivated effort–allocation perspective. Psychol Inq. 2017;28(2):113–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Lerner RM. Diversity in individual↔context relations as the basis for positive development across the life span: a developmental systems perspective for theory, research, and application. Res Hum Dev. 2004;1(4):327–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Bao ZZ, Zhang W, Li DP, Li DL, Wang YH. School climate and academic achievement among adolescents: a moderated mediation model. Psychol Dev Educ. 2013;29(1):61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Wang Q, Xiao T, Liu H, Hu W. The relationship between parental rejection and internet addiction in left-behind children: a moderated mediation model. Psychol Develop Educ. 2019;35(6):749–58.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Zhan SW, Yang N. Effect of resilience on preschool children’s behavioral problems in rural areas: Moderated mediating effect. J Psychol Sci. 2020;43(4):969–76.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Son S, Yang TS, Park J. Learning goal orientation and promotive voice: a moderated mediation model. Curr Psychol. 2022;41(12):8354–67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Chen W, Yang T, Luo J. Core self-evaluation and subjective well-being: a moderated mediation model. Front Public Health. 2022;10:1036071.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Liu QX, Sun JN, Yu S. (2019). Self–presentation in online social network sites and adolescent online altruistic behavior: The role of online social self–efficacy and hope. Psychol Dev Ed.2019;35(5):530–539.

  64. Xu T, Zhong JJ. The development of college students’ school psychological environment questionnaire. Psychol Explor. 2019;39(3):257–63.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Yu WW, Yang S, Chen M, Zhu Y, Meng QJ, Yao WJ, et al. School psychological environment and learning burnout in medical students: mediating roles of school identity and collective self–esteem. Front Psychol. 2022;13:13851912.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Luhtanen R, Crocker J. A collective self–esteem scale: self–evaluation of one’s social identity. Pers Soc Psychol B. 1992;18(3):302–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Chen H, Zhao X, Zeng M, Li J, Ren X, Zhang M, Liu Y, Yang J. Collective self-esteem and perceived stress among the non-infected general public in China during the 2019 coronavirus pandemic: a multiple mediation model. Pers Individ Dif. 2021;168:110308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Zhang K, Zhang S, Dong YH. Positive psychological capital: measurement and relationship with mental health. Stud Psychol Behav. 2010;8(1):58–64.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Zeng X, Wei B. The relationship between the psychological capital of male individuals with drug abuse and relapse tendency: A moderated mediation model.Curr Psychol. 2021;1–10.

  70. Wang Q, Sun W, Wu H. Associations between academic burnout, resilience and life satisfaction among medical students: a three-wave longitudinal study. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):248.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Hayes AF, Scharkow M. The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: does method really matter? Psychol Sci. 2013;24(10):1918–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Podsakoff PM, Mackenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Wen ZL, Huang BB, Tang DD. Preliminary work for modeling questionnaire data. J Psychol Sci. 2018;41(1):204–10.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self–determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well–being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Schenkenfelder M, Frickey EA, Larson LM. College environment and basic psychological needs: Predicting academic major satisfaction. J Couns Psychol. 2020;67(2):265–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Li D, Zhou Y, Zhao L, Wang YH, Sun WQ. Cumulative ecological risk and adolescent internet addiction: the mediating role of basic psychological need satisfaction and positive outcome expectancy. Acta Psychol Sin. 2016;48(12):1519–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Urzúa A, Henríquez D, Caqueo-Urízar A, Landabur R. Ethnic identity and collective self-esteem mediate the effect of anxiety and depression on quality of life in a migrant population. Int J Env Res Pub He. 2022;19(1):174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Du H, Li X, Chi P, Zhao L, Zhao G. Relational self-esteem, psychological well-being, and social support in children affected by HIV. J Health Psychol. 2015;20(12):1568–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Love H, May RW, Cui M, Fincham FD. Helicopter parenting, self-control, and school burnout among emerging adults. J Child Fam Stud. 2020;29:327–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Bryan J, Moore-Thomas C, Gaenzle S, Kim J, Lin CH, Na G. The effects of school bonding on high school seniors’. Acad achievement J Couns Psychol. 2012;90(4):467–80.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Molden DC, Hui CM, Scholer AA. Understanding self-regulation failure: A motivated effort-allocation account.Academic Press. 2016;425–459.

  82. Halbesleben JRB, Neveu JP, Paustian-Underdahl SC, Westman M. Getting to the “COR” understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. J Manage. 2014;40(5):1334–64.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Lapointe É, Vandenberghe C, Panaccio A. Organizational commitment, organization-based self-esteem, emotional exhaustion and turnover: a conservation of resources perspective. Hum Relat. 2011;64(12):1609–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Feilong Y, Xiang L, Haidong Z. School climate and adolescent’ social adjustment: a moderated mediation model. Chin J Clin Psychol. 2019;27:396–400.

    Google Scholar 

  85. Avey JB, Wernsing TS, Luthans F. Can positive employees help positive organizational change? Impact of psychological capital and emotions on relevant attitudes and behaviors. J Appl BehavSci. 2008;44(1):48–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Fredrickson BL. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: the broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Am Psychol. 2001;56(3):218–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by Anhui Provincial Education Department ideological and political work of young and middle-aged backbone team construction project(sztsjh-2022-7-3); The Key Project of Quality Engineering Teaching Research of Anhui Province (2020jyxm0900); The Key Project of Quality Engineering Teaching Research of Anhui Province (2021jyxm0698); Clinical Research Cultivation Program of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (2020LCYB05); The Research Fund of the Anhui Institute of Translational Medicine (2021zhyx-C45).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Wanwan Yu contributed to the conception of the study, secured funding, organized the investigation, and revised the manuscript. Wenjun Yao analyzed the data and wrote the original paper. Ming Chen helped data collection and analyzed the data. Hongqing Zhu organized the investigation and helped data collection. Jing Yan contributed the conception of the study and revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing Yan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The original study have been performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and have been approved by the Biomedical Ethics Committee of Anhui Medical University (reference number: 2022H005) where the researchers were affiliated. The participants received oral and written information and provided written informed consent before participating in the study.

Competing interests

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, W., Yao, W., Chen, M. et al. School climate and academic burnout in medical students: a moderated mediation model of collective self-esteem and psychological capital. BMC Psychol 11, 77 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s40359-023-01121-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s40359-023-01121-6

Keywords