Skip to main content
Download PDF

Prevalence and associated factors of incident and persistent loneliness among middle-aged and older adults in Thailand

BMC Psychology volume 11, Article number: 70 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence and associated factors of incident and persistent loneliness in a prospective cohort study among middle-aged and older adults (≥ 45 years) in Thailand.

Methods

Longitudinal data from the Health, Aging, and Retirement in Thailand (HART) study in 2015 and 2017 were analysed. Loneliness was assessed with one item from the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale. Logistic regression was used to calculate predictors of incident and persistent loneliness.

Results

In total, at baseline 21.7% had loneliness, 633 of 3696 participants without loneliness in 2015 had incident loneliness in 2017 (22.2%), and 239 of 790 adults had persistent loneliness (in both 2015 and 2017) (30.3%). In adjusted logistic regression analysis, low income (aOR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.57), poor self-rated physical health status (aOR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.27 to 2.12), hypertension (aOR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.65), depressive symptoms (aOR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.11 to 3.49), and having three or chronic conditions (aOR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.19 to 2.60) were positively associated and a higher education (aOR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.98) and living in the southern region of Thailand (aOR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.61) were inversely associated with incident loneliness. Poor self-rated physical health status (aOR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.26 to 2.88), and having three or more chronic diseases (aOR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.07 to 2.98), were positively associated, and living in the southern region (aOR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.65) was inversely associated with persistent loneliness.

Conclusion

More than one in five ageing adults had incident loneliness in 2 years of follow-up. The prevalence of incident and/or persistent loneliness was higher in people with a lower socioeconomic status, residing in the central region, poor self-rated physical health status, depressive symptoms, hypertension, and a higher number of chronic diseases.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Loneliness may interfere with the quantity and quality of one’s social relationships [1] and may be common among older adults as their social relations may decline [2, 3]. Loneliness affects negatively physical and mental health in old age, including mortality [4,5,6]. The prevalence of loneliness among older adults in high-income countries was 28.5% [7]. Among middle-aged and older adults in low- and middle-income countries, the prevalence of loneliness was 33.8% in India [8], in South Africa 9.9% [9], 10% in Indonesia [10], in Malaysia 32.5% [11], in Mexico 12.3% [12], and in Myanmar (31.7%) [14]. In local studies in Thailand in the Ko Rai Subdistrict, Chachoengsao, 24% of older adults reported loneliness [13], among older Adults in Chon Buri Province, a low level of loneliness was found [15], and in a qualitative study in Thailand contributing factors to loneliness included life transitions, socio-demographic factors, socio-economic and environmental factors, poor health status and health resources [16]. The prevalence of incident loneliness (4 years) among middle-aged and older adults in Indonesia was 15.1% [17], and in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) 38.4% (length of follow-up 6.86 years), and the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) in USA 30.2% (length of follow-up 8.18 years) [18].

Considering that previous local studies on loneliness in Thailand were cross-sectional, the prevalence of incident and persistent loneliness symptoms among the ageing population in Thailand is unclear, as well as the prospective relationships between baseline indicators and incident and persistent loneliness. A greater understanding of the prevalence and associated factors of incident and persistent loneliness may help in better identifying and treating modifiable risk factors in people with loneliness.

In a systematic review of longitudinal studies in high-income countries among older adults found the following risk factors for loneliness, not married, low social activity, poor self-rated health; and depression [19]. In a systematic review of mainly cross-sectional studies among older adults, female sex, older age, lower socioeconomic status, non-married status, living alone, functional disability, poor self-report physical and mental health, poor cognitive functioning, and adverse life events were associated with loneliness [20].

There is a lack of longitudinal studies in Southeast Asia investigating the determinants of incident and persistent loneliness. To address this research gap, our objective was to investigate the prevalence and associated factors of incident and persistent loneliness in a prospective cohort study among ageing adults (≥ 45 years) in Thailand.

Methods

Sample and procedure

Secondary longitudinal data from the Health, Aging, and Retirement in Thailand (HART) study in 2015 and 2017 were analysed. In a national multi-stage sampling (regions, provinces, blocks or villages, households) one individual (≥ 45 years) was randomly selected per household [21, 22]. The 2015 study (N = 5,616), and the 2017 study (N = 3,708) had a 72.3% response rate and 66.0% the retention rate; reasons for loss to follow-up were had moved away (N = 1,554), declined (N = 270) and died (N = 192).

Participants were interviewed with a structured questionnaire in 2015 and with computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI) in 2017. The “Ethics Committee in Human Research, National Institute of Development Administration – ECNIDA (ECNIDA 2020/00012)” granted approval, and participants gave written informed consent.

Measures

Outcome variable

Loneliness was measured with one item from the “Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D-10) scale,” [23], “In the past week, how often did you experience feeling lonely?” defined as “almost always (5–7 days), often (3–4 days) or sometimes (1–2 days)”=1 and “very rarely (less than one day) or none”=0. Single-item measures of loneliness have shown adequate reliability and have a high correlation with multi-item measures [24,25,26].

Covariates

Sociodemographic variables included marital status, highest level of education (no formal education illiterate/ no formal education literate, or elementary school, coded as “≤elementary school”, and middle school, high school, vocational diploma, Bachelor degree, or higher than Bachelor degree, coded as “>elementary school”), sex, age, region, religion, and personal annual income. The personal annual income was calculated based from “employment, own business, agricultural/livestock/fishing business, short-term or contract work, financial support from family, remuneration/pension income from the government fund, occupational pension fund, private pension fund, social security/welfare income, income from government living allowance, veteran’s welfare benefit, other welfare assistance income, and income from other sources, and classified low = less than 50,000 Baht, and high = 50,000 or more Thai Baht (Average exchange rate in 2015: 1 US = 34.2 Baht)” [22].

Social participation (at least one social activity in the past month) was sourced from 6 items [22, 27].

Substance use included alcohol use and smoking (never, past, or current). “Have you ever smoked cigarettes?” (response options: “1 = yes, and still smoke now, 2 = yes, but quit smoking, and 3 = never”); “Have you ever drunk alcoholic beverages such as liquor, beer, or wine?” (response options: “1 = yes, and still drinking now, 2 = yes, but do not drink now, and 3 = never)”.

Physical activity was classified as 0–149 min/week exercise, and ≥ 150 min/week exercise [28, 29].

Body Mass Index (BMI), based on self-reported height and weight: “underweight (< 18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (18.5–22.9 kg/m2), overweight (23–24.9 kg/m2), and obesity (25 + kg/m2).” [30].

Activities of daily living (ADL) disability was defined as the inability to do any of the four ADL (eating, bathing, dressing, and washing) [31].

History of accidents (injury) was assessed with the question, “In the last 2 years, were you involved in an accident that affected your physical health?” (Yes/No).

Fear of falling (FOF) with activity avoidance was defined as “so worried about falling down that I have refrained from doing certain activities.”

The self-rated physical health status (ranging from 0 = very poor to 100 excellent) was defined as 0–50 low and 60–100 high.

Depressive symptoms (≥ 10 scores) was measured with the “Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D-10) scale,” [23], excluding the loneliness item [32, 33]; (Cronbach’s alpha 0.76).

Chronic diseases were based on self-reported conditions that had been diagnosed by a health care professional, including: “1) hypertension, 2) diabetes, 3) vascular diseases, heart disease or heart failure, 4) rheumatism or arthritis, 5) bone diseases, low bone density or osteoporosis, 6) kidney diseases, 7) lung diseases/emphysema, 8) cancer, 9) liver diseases, 10) brain diseases/Alzheimer’s disease 11) visual impairment and 12) hearing impairment.” The 12 chronic diseases were classified into nine groups: (1) cardiovascular disease, heart disease, heart failure, (2) hypertension, (3) endocrine (diabetes), (4) musculoskeletal (bone diseases, rheumatism, low bone density, arthritis, and osteoporosis), (5) liver or kidney diseases, (6) respiratory (lung diseases/emphysema), (7) Cancer, (8) sensorial (visual impairment and/or hearing impairment), and (9) neurological (brain diseases/Alzheimer’s disease) [34].

Statistical analysis

Frequencies and percentages of incident and persistent loneliness were calculated. The first longitudinal logistic regression model estimated incident loneliness in 2017, excluding those with loneliness in 2015, and the second model estimated persistent loneliness (in both 2015 and 2017). Models were adjusted by chronic diseases, sociodemographic factors, lifestyle factors, social participation, depressive symptoms, and adverse life events; confounders were included based on literature review [19, 20]. Variables found significant at < 0.05 in univariate analyses were included in the multivariable models; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Missing data were discarded. Statistical analyses were conducted with StataSE 15.0 (College Station, TX, USA).

Results

Sample characteristics

In total, at baseline 21.7% had loneliness, 633 of 3696 participants without loneliness in 2015 had incident loneliness in 2017 (22.2%), and 239 of 790 adults had persistent loneliness (in both 2015 and 2017) (30.3%). In addition, the details of the sample are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Analytic sample characteristics by incident and persistent loneliness, Thailand, 2015–2017
Full size table

Associations with incident loneliness

In adjusted logistic regression analysis, low income (aOR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.57), poor self-rated physical health status (aOR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.27 to 2.12), depressive symptoms (aOR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.11 to 3.49), hypertension (aOR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.65) and having three or chronic conditions (aOR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.19 to 2.60) were positively associated and a higher education (aOR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.98) and living in the southern region of Thailand (aOR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.61) were inversely associated with incident loneliness. Furthermore, in the unadjusted analysis, older age, widowed, ADL disability, having had an accident in the past two years, fear of falling with refraining from social activities, cardiovascular disease, musculoskeletal problem, sensory and neurological conditions were positively associated with incident loneliness, while male sex, social participation, and current alcohol use were negatively associated with incident loneliness (see Table 2).

Table 2 Association between independent variables and incident loneliness, HART (2015–2017)
Full size table

Associations with persistent loneliness

In adjusted logistic regression analysis, poor self-rated physical health status (aOR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.26 to 2.88), and having three or more chronic conditions (aOR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.07 to 2.98), were positively associated and living in the southern region (aOR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.65) was negatively associated with persistent loneliness. In addition, in univariable analysis, widowed was positively associated and male sex, and living in the northern region were negatively associated with persistent loneliness (see Table 3).

Table 3 Associations between independent variables and persistent loneliness, HART (2015–2017)
Full size table

Discussion

In this first prospective cohort study in among ageing adults in Thailand, we found that the prevalence of incident loneliness in a 2-year follow-up was 22.2%, which is higher than among ageing adults (4-year follow-up) in Indonesia (15.1%) [17], and lower than in ELSA (38.4%) (length of follow-up 6.86 years), and the HRS (30.2%) (length of follow-up 8.18 years) [18]. The cross-sectional prevalence of loneliness was 21.7% in this study, which is lower than in a community study in persons aged 60 years and older in the Ko Rai subdistrict, Chachoengsao, Thailand (24%) [13], in Myanmar (31.7%) [14], Malaysia (32.5%) [11], in India (33.8%) [8] but lower than in Mexico (12.3%) [12] and South Africa (9.9%) [9]. This study showed that loneliness is a significant public health issue in Thailand, calling for intervention programmes to reduce the burden of loneliness.

We found that lower economic status, lower education, living in the central region, poor self-rated physical health, depressive symptoms, hypertension, and a higher number of chronic diseases were associated with incident loneliness. In addition, living in the central region, poor self-rated physical health, and having three or more chronic conditions were associated with persistent loneliness. The observed associations were in univariate analysis higher among females, widowed, increased age and those who had no social participation.

Consistent with previous longitudinal and cross-sectional reviews [19, 20], we found that lower socioeconomic status, depressive symptoms, and poor self-perceived health were associated with loneliness. People with lower socioeconomic status may have less access to social engagement and activities, which may increase loneliness [10, 20, 35]. Depressed mood and poor self-rated health status may be closely linked with loneliness and its relationship is complex and probably bidirectional [36,37,38]. In addition, in agreement with previous reviews [19, in high-income countries from 1999 to 2018; 20, except for one study in Nepal, all other studies from high income countries, from 2000 to 2012], in univariate analysis, female sex, widowed, no social participation, ADL disability, adverse life event (accident, fear of falling with activity avoidance) were associated with incident loneliness. We found a lower risk of loneliness among older adults living in the southern region of Thailand. However, when calculating the baseline loneliness prevalence, we found a significantly higher prevalence of loneliness in the southern region (36.5%) than in the central region (18.0%). Meaning that the southern region had a higher baseline prevalence of loneliness than in the other regions, but the southern region had a lower prevalence of incident and persistent loneliness than in the other regions. The high baseline prevalence of loneliness in the southern region may be explained by lower economic indicators [22], lower health care utilization in older rural than urban dwellers [39], and compared to Bangkok older adults in rural areas have a disadvantage in healthcare due to lower socioeconomic capacity and lower healthcare access [40]. On the other hand, the lower prevalence of incident and persistent loneliness in the southern region of Thailand, may be attributed to the southern region having the highest number of Muslims and may be more rural than other regions, while the highest rate of loneliness was in the central region, which is the most urbanized region, all of which are factors that increase loneliness [41]. A previous study found a negative correlation between perceived social support and loneliness among older Muslims [42].

Furthermore, the existence of multiple chronic diseases was found to be associated with incident and persistent loneliness. In a longitudinal study in Germany, the multimorbidity was associated with incident loneliness [43], and in a cross-sectional study in the UK, physical multimorbidity was in a dose response fashion associated with loneliness [44]. The development of loneliness may be explained by limiting participation in activities and dependency feelings due to multimorbidity [9, 10, 45, 46]. In particular, hypertension was found to be associated with incident loneliness in this study. Previous studies showed that loneliness was a risk factor for hypertension [e.g., 47], or it could also be bidirectional [48].

In univariate analysis musculoskeletal conditions, cardiovascular disease, sensory loss and neurological problems were association with incident loneliness. Musculoskeletal conditions are often associated with body pain, and Emerson et al. [49] found in a longitudinal study that pain was a risk factor for loneliness among older adults, while in another study bidirectional longitudinal associations were found between loneliness and pain [50]. In a cross-sectional annual survey having had a stroke was associated with higher levels of loneliness [51]. However, in a longitudinal study in England there was an association between coronary heart disease and incident loneliness, but this became non-significant in the adjusted analysis [52]. Persistent loneliness increased the risk of developing dementia and Alzheimer’s disease [53]. In a longitudinal study in China, sensory impairment increased the risk of loneliness [54], and in a systematic review hearing loss increased the odds of loneliness [55]. Ageing adults with impaired vision and/or hearing may be more likely to experience ADL disability and poor social support, which can lead to incident loneliness.

Unlike some previous research (in terms of substance use [56] and physical inactivity [57], our study did not find a significant association between smoking, alcohol use, and physical inactivity with incident and persistent loneliness. Similarly to a longitudinal study in Germany [58], this survey was unable to find a significant association between obesity and loneliness.

Study limitations

A limitation of the study was a large proportion of loss of follow-up (32%). Like in many previous studies, we evaluated loneliness with a single item, which, however, has shown high correlations with multi-item loneliness measures [24,25,26]. Some variables, such as living status and cognitive function, were not assessed, and should become part of future research. Furthermore, the study used a screening questionnaire for depression. The follow-up period (2 years) was relatively short, and longer repeated follow-ups may be needed to identify stronger results.

Conclusion

More than one in five ageing adults had incident loneliness in 2 years of follow-up. The prevalence of incident and/or persistent loneliness was higher in people with a lower socioeconomic status, residing in the central region, poor self-rated physical health status, depressive symptoms, hypertension, and a higher number of chronic diseases. Results show the importance of baseline health status indicators in relation to impacting longitudinal changes in loneliness. Identifying individuals with the identified risk factors can help in providing early interventions to prevent the development of loneliness.

Data Availability

Data is publicly available at Gateway to Global Ageing Data, Health, Aging, and Retirement in Thailand: https://g2aging.org/?section=study&studyid=44.

References

  1. Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. Loneliness matters: a theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2010;40:218–27. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s12160-010-9210-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Qualter P, Vanhalst J, Harris R, Van Roekel E, Lodder G, Bangee M et al. Loneliness across the life span.Perspect Psychol Sci2015;10, 250 – 64.

  3. Luanaigh CO, Lawlor BA. Loneliness and the health of older people. Int J Geriatric Psychiatry. 2008;23(12):1213–21. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1002/gps.2054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Courtin E, Knapp M. Social isolation, loneliness and health in old age: a scoping review. Health Soc Care Community. 2017;25(3):799–812. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/hsc.12311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Solmi M, Veronese N, Galvano D, Favaro A, Ostinelli EG, Noventa V, Favaretto E, Tudor F, Finessi M, Shin JI, Smith L, Koyanagi A, Cester A, Bolzetta F, Cotroneo A, Maggi S, Demurtas J, De Leo D, Trabucchi M. Factors Associated with loneliness: an Umbrella Review of Observational Studies. J Affect Disord. 2020;271:131–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.075.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rico-Uribe LA, Caballero FF, Martín-María N, Cabello M, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Miret M. Association of loneliness with all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(1):e0190033. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1371/journal.pone.0190033.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Chawla K, Kunonga TP, Stow D, Barker R, Craig D, Hanratty B. Prevalence of loneliness amongst older people in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(7):e0255088. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1371/journal.pone.0255088.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Pengpid S, Peltzer K. Prevalence and correlates of loneliness among a nationally representative population-based sample of middle-aged and older adults in India. Int J Disabil Hum Dev. 2022;21(2):151–8.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Phaswana-Mafuya N, Peltzer K. Loneliness and health among older adults in South Africa. Glob J Health Sci. 2017;9(12). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.5539/gjhs.v9n12p1.

  10. Peltzer K, Pengpid S. Loneliness correlates and associations with health variables in the general population in Indonesia. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2019;13:24. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s13033-019-0281-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Teh JK, Tey NP, Ng ST. Family support and loneliness among older persons in multiethnic Malaysia. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:654382. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1155/2014/654382.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Peltzer K, Pengpid S. Prevalence and correlates of loneliness among a nationally representative population-based sample of older adults in Mexico. Int J Disabil Hum Dev. 2020;19(3):581–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Phuangcharoen C, Thayansin S. The loneliness of older adults Associated with various types of thai families. JPSS. 2022;30:207–21. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.25133/JPSSv302022.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Akhter-Khan SC, Wai KM, Drewelies J. Loneliness in Myanmar’s older population: a mixed-methods investigation. J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2022;37(3):315–37. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s10823-022-09459-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Piboon K, Subgranon R, Hengudomsub P, Wongnam P, Louise Callen B. A causal model of depression among older adults in Chon Buri Province, Thailand. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2012;33(2):118–26. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3109/01612840.2011.630497.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Aroonsrimorakot S, Laiphrakpam M, Metadilogkul O, et al. Ageing, social isolation, loneliness, Health, Social Care and Longevity: insights from Case Studies in Thailand and India. Ageing Int. 2019;44:371–84. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s12126-019-09353-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Akhter-Khan SC, Chua KC, Al Kindhi B, Mayston R, Prina M. Unpaid productive activities and loneliness in later life: results from the Indonesian Family Life Survey (2000–2014). Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2023;105:104851. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.archger.2022.104851.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sutin AR, Luchetti M, Aschwanden D, Lee JH, Sesker AA, Stephan Y, Terracciano A. Sense of purpose in life and concurrent loneliness and risk of incident loneliness: an individual-participant meta-analysis of 135,227 individuals from 36 cohorts. J Affect Disord. 2022;309:211–20. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.084.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Dahlberg L, McKee KJ, Frank A, Naseer M. A systematic review of longitudinal risk factors for loneliness in older adults. Aging Ment Health. 2022;26(2):225–49. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1080/13607863.2021.1876638.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cohen-Mansfield J, Hazan H, Lerman Y, Shalom V. Correlates and predictors of loneliness in older-adults: a review of quantitative results informed by qualitative insights. Int Psychogeriatr. 2016;28(4):557–76. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1017/S1041610215001532.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Anantanasuwong D, Theerawanviwat D, Siripanich P. Panel survey and study on health and aging, and retirement in Thailand. In: Gu D, Dupre M, editors. Encyclopedia of gerontology and population aging. Cham: Springer; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Anantanasuwong D, Pengpid S, Peltzer K. Prevalence and Associated factors of successful ageing among people 50 years and older in a National Community Sample in Thailand. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(17):10705. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph191710705.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Andresen EM, Malmgren JA, Carter WB, Patrick DL. Screening for depression in well older adults: evaluation of a short form of the CES-D. Am J Prev Med. 1994;10(2):77–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stickley A, Koyanagi A, Leinsalu M, Ferlander S, Sabawoon W, McKee M. Loneliness and health in Eastern Europe: fndings from Moscow, Russia. Public Health. 2015;129(4):403–10. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j. puhe.2014.12.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mund M, Maes M, Drewke PM, Gutzeit A, Jaki I, Qualter P. Would the real loneliness please stand up? The validity of loneliness scores and the reliability of single-item scores. Assessment. 2022;10731911221077227. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1177/10731911221077227.

  26. Newmyer L, Verdery AM, Margolis R, Pessin L. Measuring older adult loneliness across Countries. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021;76(7):1408–14. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/geronb/gbaa109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Berkman LF, Sekher TV, Capistrant B, Zheng Y. Social networks, family, and care giving among older adults in India. In: Smith JP, Majmundar M, editors. Aging in Asia: findings from new and emerging data initiatives. Washington DC: The National Academic Press; 2012. pp. 261–78.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kim JH. Regular physical exercise and its association with depression: a population-based study short title: Exercise and depression. Psychiatry Res. 2022;309:114406. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Licence: CC BY-NC- SA3.0 IGO, 2020. URL: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240015128 (accessed 2 April 2022)

  30. Wen CP, David Cheng TY, Tsai SP, Chan HT, Hsu HL, Hsu CC, et al. Are Asians at greater mortality risks for being overweight than Caucasians? Redefining obesity for Asians. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12(4):497–506. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1017/S1368980008002802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Katz S, Ford AB, Heiple KG, Newill VA. Studies of illness in the aged: recovery after fracture of the hip. J Gerontol. 1964;19:285–93. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/geronj/19.3.285.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yu B, Steptoe A, Niu K, Ku PW, Chen LJ. Prospective associations of social isolation and loneliness with poor sleep quality in older adults. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(3):683–91. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s11136-017-1752-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Van As BAL, Imbimbo E, Franceschi A, Menesini E, Nocentini A. The longitudinal association between loneliness and depressive symptoms in the elderly: a systematic review. Int Psychogeriatr. 2022;34(7):657–69. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1017/S1041610221000399.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tey NP, Lai SL, Teh JK. The debilitating effects of chronic diseases among the oldest old in China. Maturitas. 2016;94:39–45. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.08.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Algren MH, Ekholm O, Nielsen L, Ersbøll AK, Bak CK, Andersen PT. Social isolation, loneliness, socioeconomic status, and health-risk behaviour in deprived neighbourhoods in Denmark: a cross-sectional study. SSM Popul Health. 2020;10:100546. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100546.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Cacioppo JT, Hawkley LC, Thisted RA. Perceived social isolation makes me sad: 5-year cross-lagged analyses of loneliness and depressive symptomatology in the Chicago Health, Aging, and Social Relations Study. Psychol Aging. 2010;25(2):453–63. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1037/a0017216.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Giacco D. Loneliness and mood disorders: consequence, cause and/or unholy alliance? Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2023;36(1):47–53. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000832.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ward M, Briggs R, McGarrigle CA, De Looze C, O’Halloran AM, Kenny RA. The bi-directional association between loneliness and depression among older adults from before to during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2023;38(1):e5856. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1002/gps.5856.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Quashie NT, Pothisiri W. Rural-urban gaps in health care utilization among older Thais: the role of family support. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2019;81:201–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.archger.2018.12.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Vicerra PMM. Regional disparity of physical function limitation among older adults in Thailand. Online J Health Allied Scs. 2022;21(2):5. https://www.ojhas.org/issue82/2022-2-5.html.

    Google Scholar 

  41. UNICEF East Asia and Pacific Regional Office. Thailand Case Study in Education, Conflict and Social Cohesion, 2014). URL: https://deepsouthwatch.org/sites/default/files/archives/docs/unicef_thailand_education_conflcit_socialcohesion2014.pdf

  42. Dural G, Kavak Budak F, Özdemir AA, Gültekin A. Effect of Perceived Social Support on Self-care Agency and Loneliness among Elderly Muslim People. J Relig Health. 2022;61(2):1505–13. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s10943-021-01377-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Schübbe SF, König HH, Hajek A. Multimorbidity and loneliness. Longitudinal analysis based on the GSOEP. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2023;105:104843. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.archger.2022.104843.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Stickley A, Koyanagi A. Physical multimorbidity and loneliness: a population-based study. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(1):e0191651. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1371/journal.pone.0191651.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Jessen MAB, Pallesen AVJ, Kriegbaum M, Kristiansen M. The association between loneliness and health—a survey-basedstudy among middleaged and older adults in Denmark. Aging Ment Health. 2018;22(10):1338–43. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1080/13607863.2017.1348480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Eckerblad J, Theander K, Ekdahl A, Jaarsma T, Hellstrom I. To adjust and endure: a qualitative study of symptom burden in older people with multimorbidity. Appl Nurs Res. 2015; 28: 322–327. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.apnr.2015.03.008 PMID: 26608433

  47. Momtaz YA, Hamid TA, Yusoff S, Ibrahim R, Chai ST, Yahaya N, Abdullah SS. Loneliness as a risk factor for hypertension in later life. J Aging Health. 2012;24(4):696–710. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1177/0898264311431305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Turana Y, Tengkawan J, Chia YC, Shin J, Chen CH, Park S, Tsoi K, Buranakitjaroen P, Soenarta AA, Siddique S, Cheng HM, Tay JC, Teo BW, Wang TD, Kario K. Mental health problems and hypertension in the elderly: review from the HOPE Asia Network. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2021;23(3):504–12. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/jch.14121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Emerson K, Boggero I, Ostir G, Jayawardhana J. Pain as a risk factor for loneliness among older adults. J Aging Health. 2018;30(9):1450–61. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1177/0898264317721348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Loeffler A, Steptoe A. Bidirectional longitudinal associations between loneliness and pain, and the role of inflammation. Pain. 2021;162(3):930–7. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002082.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Byrne C, Saville CWN, Coetzer R, Ramsey R. Stroke survivors experience elevated levels of loneliness: a multi-year analysis of the National Survey for Wales. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2022;37(2):390–407. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/arclin/acab046.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Smith K, Victor C. Investigating the longitudinal relationship between cardiometabolic conditions and loneliness in older people.Innov Aging. 2018Nov; 2(Suppl 1):964.

  53. Akhter-Khan SC, Tao Q, Ang TFA, Itchapurapu IS, Alosco ML, Mez J, Piers RJ, Steffens DC, Au R, Qiu WQ. Associations of loneliness with risk of Alzheimer’s disease dementia in the Framingham Heart Study. Alzheimers Dement. 2021;17(10):1619–27. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1002/alz.12327.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Wang Q, Zhang S, Wang Y, Zhao D, Zhou C. Dual sensory impairment as a predictor of loneliness and isolation in older adults: National Cohort Study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022;8(11):e39314. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.2196/39314.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Shukla A, Harper M, Pedersen E, Goman A, Suen JJ, Price C, Applebaum J, Hoyer M, Lin FR, Reed NS. Hearing loss, loneliness, and social isolation: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;162(5):622–33. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1177/0194599820910377.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Chang YC, Lee YH, Chiang T, Liu CT. Associations of Smoking and Alcohol Consumption with loneliness, Depression, and loss of interest among chinese older males and females. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022;1–16. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s11469-022-00912-z.

  57. Pengpid S, Peltzer K. Physical activity, health and well-being among a nationally representative population-based sample of middle-aged and older adults in India, 2017–2018. Heliyon. 2021;7(12):e08635. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08635.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Hajek A, König HH. Does obesity lead to loneliness and perceived social isolation in the second half of life? Findings from a nationally representative study in Germany. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2021;21(9):836–41. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1111/ggi.14246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Health, Aging, and Retirement in Thailand (HART) study is sponsored by Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI) and National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT).

Funding

The Health, Aging, and Retirement in Thailand (HART) study is sponsored by Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI) and National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Education and Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand

    Supa Pengpid & Karl Peltzer

  2. Department of Public Health, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa

    Supa Pengpid

  3. Department of Healthcare Administration, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan

    Supa Pengpid

  4. Department of Psychology, University of the Free State, PO Box 339 (40), 9300, Bloemfontein, South Africa

    Karl Peltzer

  5. Department of Psychology, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan

    Karl Peltzer

Authors
  1. Supa Pengpid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karl Peltzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SP and KP conceived and designed the research, performed statistical analysis, drafted the manuscript and made critical revisions of the manuscript for key intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript and agreed to the authorship and order of authorship.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karl Peltzer.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The “Ethics Committee in Human Research, National Institute of Development Administration – ECNIDA (ECNIDA 2020/00012)” granted approval, and participants gave written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pengpid, S., Peltzer, K. Prevalence and associated factors of incident and persistent loneliness among middle-aged and older adults in Thailand. BMC Psychol 11, 70 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s40359-023-01115-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s40359-023-01115-4

Keywords

BMC Psychology

ISSN: 2050-7283

Contact us