BMC Psychology

Table 8 Post-hoc comparisons - effects on time in participant 4

From: Getting nowhere fast: trade-off between speed and precision in training to execute image-guided hand-tool movements

	D Means	t	P
Session 1
2D vs. Direct	2.425	10.05	0.000
2D vs. Fisheye	0.957	3.96	0.000
Fisheye vs. Direct	3.381	14.02	0.000
Session 2
2D vs. Direct	2.202	9.13	0.000
2D vs. Fisheye	0.217	0.90	0.368 NS
Fisheye vs. Direct	2.420	10.03	0.000
Session 3
2D vs. Direct	1.673	6.93	0.000
2D vs. Fisheye	0.359	1.48	0.137 NS
Fisheye vs. Direct	2.031	8.42	0.000
Session 4
2D vs. Direct	1.772	7.34	0.000
2D vs. Fisheye	0.177	0.73	0.464 NS
Fisheye vs. Direct	1.595	6.61	0.000
Session 5
2D vs. Direct	1.263	5.23	0.000
2D vs. Fisheye	0.344	1.43	0.154 NS
Fisheye vs. Direct	1.607	6.66	0.000
Session 6
2D vs. Direct	1.686	6.99	0.000
2D vs. Fisheye	0.243	1.01	0.314 NS
Fisheye vs. Direct	1.929	7.99	0.000
Session 7
2D vs. Direct	1.839	7.62	0.000
2D vs. Fisheye	0.381	1.58	0.114 NS
Fisheye vs. Direct	2.220	9.20	0.000
Session 8
2D vs. Direct	1.740	7.21	0.000
2D vs. Fisheye	0.068	0.28	0.778 NS
Fisheye vs. Direct	1.808	7.49	0.000

Results of the post-hoc comparisons for effects on time of the three levels of ‘viewing’ (V₃) in the eight levels of ‘session’ (S₈) in level 4 of the ‘participant’ factor. Effect sizes (D Means), t values, and unadjusted probabilities (P) are given for each comparison

Back to article page

ISSN: 2050-7283

Contact us

General enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com