Table 6 Post-hoc comparisons - effects on time in participant 3

From: Getting nowhere fast: trade-off between speed and precision in training to execute image-guided hand-tool movements

	D Means	t	P
Session 1
2D vs. Direct	3.442	14.27	0.000
2D vs. Fisheye	1.820	7.55	0.000
Fisheye vs. Direct	5.263	21.82	0.000
Session 2
2D vs. Direct	3.800	15.76	0.000
2D vs. Fisheye	0.952	3.95	0.000
Fisheye vs. Direct	4.753	19.70	0.000
Session 3
2D vs. Direct	2.998	12.43	0.000
2D vs. Fisheye	0.423	1.75	0.079 NS
Fisheye vs. Direct	3.421	14.18	0.000
Session 4
2D vs. Direct	2.150	8.91	0.000
2D vs. Fisheye	0.039	0.16	0.870 NS
Fisheye vs. Direct	2.189	9.07	0.000
Session 5
2D vs. Direct	1.581	6.55	0.000
2D vs. Fisheye	0.325	1.35	0.178 NS
Fisheye vs. Direct	1.906	7.90	0.000
Session 6
2D vs. Direct	2.146	8.89	0.000
2D vs. Fisheye	0.094	0.39	0.694 NS
Fisheye vs. Direct	2.051	8.50	0.000
Session 7
2D vs. Direct	2.360	9.78	0.000
2D vs. Fisheye	0.257	1.06	0.288 NS
Fisheye vs. Direct	2.103	8.72	0.000
Session 8
2D vs. Direct	1.958	8.17	0.000
2D vs. Fisheye	0.124	0.51	0.608 NS
Fisheye vs. Direct	1.834	7.61	0.000

Results of the post-hoc comparisons for effects on time of the three levels of ‘viewing’ (V₃) in the eight levels of ‘session’ (S₈) in level 3 of the ‘participant’ factor. Effect sizes (D Means), t values, and unadjusted probabilities (P) are given for each comparison

Back to article page