Skip to main content

Table 2 Post-hoc comparisons - effects on time in participant 1

From: Getting nowhere fast: trade-off between speed and precision in training to execute image-guided hand-tool movements

 

D Means

t

P

Session 1

 2D vs. Direct

6.772

28.07

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

0.040

0.17

0.867 NS

 Fisheye vs. Direct

6.732

27.91

0.000

Session 2

 2D vs. Direct

5.231

21.69

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

0.440

1.82

0.068 NS

 Fisheye vs. Direct

5.671

23.51

0.000

Session 3

 2D vs. Direct

3.752

15.55

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

1.145

4.75

0.000

 Fisheye vs. Direct

4.897

20.30

0.000

Session 4

 2D vs. Direct

3.721

15.43

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

0.677

2.81

0.005

 Fisheye vs. Direct

3.045

12.62

0.000

Session 5

 2D vs. Direct

4.381

18.16

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

0.492

2.04

0.041

 Fisheye vs. Direct

3.889

16.12

0.000

Session 6

 2D vs. Direct

4.940

20.48

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

0.117

0.48

0.682 NS

 Fisheye vs. Direct

4.823

19.99

0.000

Session 7

 2D vs. Direct

2.660

11.03

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

0.296

1.23

0.219 NS

 Fisheye vs. Direct

2.956

12.26

0.000

Session 8

 2D vs. Direct

3.032

12.57

0.000

 2D vs. Fisheye

0.048

0.19

0.843 NS

 Fisheye vs. Direct

2.984

12.37

0.000

  1. Results of the post-hoc comparisons for effects on time of the three levels of ‘viewing’ (V 3 ) in the eight levels of ‘session’ (S 8 ) in level 1 of the ‘participant’ factor. Effect sizes (D Means), t values, and unadjusted probabilities (P) are given for each comparison