Skip to main content

Table 3 Separate logistic regression analyses between age-bridging contacts and women’s self-rated depression for various subgroups within the sample. Odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI)

From: Social capital – a mixed blessing for women? A cross-sectional study of different forms of social relations and self-rated depression in Moscow

 

OR

95 % CI

p

n

Nagelkerke

Age

 18–40 years

0.45

0.26–0.80**

0.006

239

0.057

 41–94 years

0.90

0.61–1.32

0.582

441

0.002

Educational level

 High

0.55

0.33–0.92**

0.021

341

0.027

 Medium

1.14

0.67–1.95

0.628

215

0.002

 Low

0.61

0.31–1.19

0.144

124

0.022

Economic problems

 Few

0.50

0.31–0.81*

0.005

295

0.052

 Many

0.98

0.64–1.50

0.915

385

0.012

Marital status

 Married/cohabiting

0.75

0.49–1.17

0.210

337

0.006

 Divorced/widowed

0.80

0.46–1.40

0.438

236

0.009

 Never married

0.44

0.18–1.08

0.072

105

0.045

Small children

 Children 0–5 years

0.21

0.06–0.68*

0.010

63

0.217

 No small children

0.80

0.58–1.12

0.191

617

0.004

Nature of work

 Manual labour

0.88

0.37–2.08

0.774

84

0.001

 Manual labour, skilled

0.50

0.19–1.27

0.145

76

0.039

 Intellectual work

0.82

0.43–1.57

0.547

141

0.004

 Intellectual work, skilled

0.57

0.32–1.02

0.056

253

0.035

 Intellectual work, leading position

1.07

0.21–5.43

0.931

41

0.031

  1. *p < 0.05 **p < 0.005 ***p < 0.001
  2. NOTE: Standardised according to the educational-level proportions of the Moscow City population given in the 2002 census for the population over 18 years