Skip to main content

Table 5 Accuracy. Expressed as median (interquartile range), percentage of 16 possible correct responses

From: Neural responses to a modified Stroop paradigm in patients with complex chronic musculoskeletal pain compared to matched controls: an experimental functional magnetic resonance imaging study

 

Run 1

Run 2

 

Patients

Control

Patients

Control

Affective Control

94 % [55 % to 100 %]

100 % [94 % to 100 %]

100 % [70 % to 100 %]

100 % [94 % to 100 %]

Affective Interference

94 % [55 % to 100 %]

100 % [94 % to 100 %]

97 % [66 % to 100 %]

100 % [94 % to 100 %]

Positive Control

94 % [56 % to 100 %]

100 % [94 % to 100 %]

94 % [73 % to 100 %]

100 % [94 % to 100 %]

Positive Interference

91 % [50 % to 100 %]

97 % [88 % to 100 %]

94 % [69 % to 100 %]

100 % [94 % to 100 %]

Sensory Control

94 % [50 % to 100 %]

100 % [94 % to 100 %]

100 % [69 % to 100 %]

100 % [94 % to 100 %]

Sensory Interference

91 % [50 % to 100 %]

100 % [94 % to 100 %]

100 % [88 % to 100 %]

100 % [100 % to 100 %]

  1. Summary data for accuracy was reported as median and interquartile range to provide some information on the asymmetry of the distribution of the data and to allow for the fixed upper limit of 100 % for accuracy as many of the participants had accuracy scores close to or at this level